Skip to content
Calculator

Report

State of Peptides 2026

Approvals, the clinical pipeline, regulation, sport, search demand and testing, compiled from the data behind Grey Peptides. Every figure below is computed from a named source file with its own as-of date, and the full dataset downloads as CSV.

Published 2026-10-03 · By the Grey Peptides Editorial Board · Download the data (CSV)

Key findings

  • 2026 has outpaced the previous three years combined. Of 17 first FDA approvals from 2023 to 2026 among molecules we track, 10 came in 2026, against 7 in 2023 to 2025 together; 10 of the 17 are labelled peptides by their source (as of 2026-10-02 / 2026-10-03).
  • Most peptides people ask about are not approved. Of 348 encyclopedia entries, 114 are FDA-approved; 103 are research-only and 35 are approved elsewhere but not in the US (as of 2026-10-03).
  • Evidence is uneven. 148 entries carry our high evidence grade and 101 our low grade, mostly where human data are thin or absent.
  • Sport is strict. 204 of the entries with a 2026 WADA record are prohibited, either named on the list or, by our reading, under its S0 section for unapproved substances; 54 are unsettled.
  • The pipeline is large but mostly mid-stage. 331 INN-named peptides have reached phase 2 or beyond, and 97 have an active study on ClinicalTrials.gov.
  • Weight loss is the largest search theme. Of 7,503 unique autocomplete suggestions collected for peptide searches, 1,021 relate to weight loss, against 209 about safety or side effects.
  • Testing data are selective. The largest buyer-submitted testing aggregator we checked listed 4,367 retatrutide tests from 378 sellers; of the last 200 visible, 63 failed. Buyer-submitted results are not a random sample.

Approvals: 2026 outpaces the previous three years

The chart counts first FDA approvals of molecules Grey Peptides tracks, by year. It combines our FDA peptide table with encyclopedia entries, using each molecule's earliest dated approval, so a new formulation or generic of an older drug is not counted. It includes some proteins and one small molecule, orforglipron, labelled as such below; it is not an exhaustive count of every FDA approval (as of 2026-10-02 / 2026-10-03).

First FDA approvals by year, 2023 to 2026202352024120251202610
First FDA approvalMoleculeBrandClass (source label)
2023-03-10Trofinetidepeptide
2023-03-22Rezafunginpeptide
2023-06-27SomatrogonNGENLAprotein
2023-09-08Motixafortidepeptide
2023-10-17ZilucoplanZILBRYSQpeptide
2024-08-09Palopegteriparatidepeptide-conjugate
2025-09-19SS-31 (Elamipretide)FORZINITYpeptide
2026-02-27NavepegritideYUVIWELpeptide
2026-03-17IcotrokinraICOTYDEpeptide
2026-03-26Insulin icodecAWIQLI FLEXTOUCHprotein
2026-04-01Orforglipronsmall-molecule
2026-05-22Bulevirtidepeptide
2026-07-15EnlicitideLIPFENDRApeptide
2026-08-19GaretosmabPASATRUprotein
2026-08-28RusfertideMIMRYLOpeptide
2026-09-11ApitegromabISEMBYLDprotein
2026-09-23Insulin efsitora alfaONSWIKprotein

The encyclopedia: what is approved, and how good is the evidence

Grey Peptides covers 348 peptides and peptide-like compounds in depth. Their US status, as recorded on each entry with its source, splits as follows (as of 2026-10-03).

Encyclopedia entries by US statusApproved114Research only103In clinical trials47Not approved in the US35Discontinued28Supplement8Preclinical6In development2

Each entry also carries our evidence grade, from reading the studies: high where randomised human trials support the main uses, low where evidence is mostly animal or cell work.

Encyclopedia entries by evidence gradeHigh148Medium99Low101

Sport: the 2026 WADA picture

For entries with a 2026 WADA Prohibited List record, the status splits as follows. 'S0, inferred' means the substance is not approved for human use anywhere, so the list's catch-all S0 section applies by our reading; our WADA hub explains each category (as of 2026-10-03).

Entries by 2026 WADA statusS0 (unapproved), inferred130Not listed90Named as prohibited73Unsettled54Prohibited in competition1

The pipeline

Our pipeline tracker follows every INN-named peptide whose highest ChEMBL phase is 2 or more: 331 molecules, 97 with an active study on ClinicalTrials.gov and 5 with a readout date that has passed (as of 2026-10-02). Phase 4 here means the molecule has reached approval somewhere.

Pipeline molecules by highest phase reachedPhase 2205Phase 348Phase 478

Across the wider Registry of 767 molecules, statuses split as follows (as of 2026-10-02).

Registry molecules by statusApproved136Withdrawn2Phase 346Phase 2198Phase 112Preclinical1Unknown175Endogenous (natural hormone)197

Regulation in 2026

FDA's page of bulk substances that may present significant safety risks in compounding lists 31 substances, many of them peptides (read 2026-10-01). Our regulatory tracker records each peptide's status by jurisdiction:

JurisdictionStatus counts across tracked peptides
USnot-approved: 25; Approved: 15; approval-discontinued: 4
UKnone-found: 33; licensed: 11
EUnot-centrally-authorised: 34; centrally-authorised: 10
Canadanot-authorised: 32; marketed: 10; cancelled: 2
Australiaunverified: 44
WADANamed as prohibited: 18; prohibited-inferred: 10; Not listed: 10; Unsettled: 6

The dated events we covered this year, each linked to its Wire post and primary source:

Our country law pages cover enforcement in nine countries.

What people search for

For the Phase 2 content audit, we collected 816 autocomplete seed queries, yielding 7,503 unique suggestions (collected 2026-09-26). Grouped by theme, with a suggestion able to fall into more than one:

Autocomplete suggestions by themeweight loss1,021skin / hair / beauty514muscle / performance237buying / for sale212safety / side effects209legality / FDA82

Testing

Our lab results database, built from published independent reports and not yet public as a page, holds 12 rows of published, independent results so far (updated 2026-10-01). Buyer-submitted testing is far larger but self-selected; our retatrutide testing article explains why its pass rates cannot be read as a market average.

Methodology

Every figure on this page is computed by a script from Grey Peptides' own source files, each of which records where its data came from and when it was read: the Registry (ChEMBL, Drugs@FDA via openFDA, UniProt), the encyclopedia dataset (labels, Drugs@FDA, PubMed and the WADA Prohibited List, each cited on its entry), the pipeline tracker (ChEMBL and ClinicalTrials.gov), the regulatory tracker, the Wire, Google autocomplete suggestions collected for our content audit, and our lab results database. The CSV lists every figure with its source file and as-of date. Counts reflect what Grey Peptides tracks; they are not a census of all peptides or all approvals. Approvals are first approvals of a molecule, not new formulations or indications. Status and evidence grades are our editorial readings of cited sources, explained on our methodology page.

Journalists and researchers may use the figures with attribution to Grey Peptides and a link to this page.